AlertHub Research

Wildfire journalism as warning communication

This project examines how wildfire journalism can strengthen European warning communication by acting as a multiplier of official alerts rather than a passive relay of crisis information. Based on a mixed-methods analysis of 250 wildfire-related news articles published during the 2025 fire season in Portugal and Spain, the research shows that journalistic framing significantly shapes how audiences perceive risk and their capacity to respond.

About the Project

Wildfire coverage matters not only because it reports danger, but because it can help audiences understand what the risk means and what to do next. In fire-prone regions, journalism plays an important public role when it turns official warnings into clear, usable information for citizens, communities, and local decision-makers.

Main Findings
Coverage that combines threat information with clear, actionable guidance is associated with stronger perceived efficacy, greater public usability, and better alignment between official warnings and citizen response.

By contrast, alarmist reporting without practical guidance tends to increase perceived threat without improving coping capacity. The study therefore supports a shift toward integrated threat-and-efficacy communication.
Why it Matters

This model is particularly relevant for wildfire-prone regions in Europe, where risk is recurrent and socially embedded. It also aligns with European disaster risk reduction and civil protection frameworks by improving the clarity, usability, and cross-border transferability of warning communication.

Best Practices Manual

Best Practices Manual for News Coverage of Forest Fires in Portugal and Spain. This website includes the manual in English, Portuguese, and Spanish, translating findings into editorial guidance.

Open Research Materials

Explore the codebook, statistical procedures, dataset, and visual results available on this site. The platform is designed to promote full transparency.